under the guise of looking out for users security.
So not tragedy for them, its money, money, money, out of our pockets and into theirs. Plus secure core, the chip isn’t that secure either (Xbox homebrew anyone) and I will only be proven right in time, by the flood of exploits hat will be found and misused by all now that it will be shoved down everyone’s gullets, like it or not. I also dont want secure core silicone additions to already bullcrap Intel ME technology which is also insecure and wildly exploited. They lost me years ago as MVP and beta tester when they ignored opensource, and now they lost me as a user because when they flip the switch on Windows 10 and no more security updates come, I will be using it for the rare programs that dont run in wine or VMs on some air gapped computer, and making the switch to QubeOS permanently as my secure OS choice.Īnd also because I dont want to buy any new hardware like TPM which is a proven insecure technology and will be much more exploited because now every new PC will have one and bad people will exploit it to get past it just for the hell of it and profit in some cases. So tragedy is right, but not for MS, its all good there.
Because its important to experiment at the expense of customers/users because its important that shops and other businesses have to suffer the incessant barrage of ignorant product managers policies who only do stuff in order to justify their bloated wages. Tragedy is the least of all, when people get less, have NO real improvements, like explorer where art thy tabs, where art thy context menu zip/rar/other/programs entries hidden in sub menus.Īnd why is there so much more telemetry and why there is less customization options and why, just why not spend time/money making windows 10 better and fixing bugs that have really never been fixed since inception?Īh right.
0 kommentar(er)
